guidestarblog_header.png

Is Your Nonprofit Planning to Fail?

GrantStation conducts a semi-annual survey on the State of Grantseeking™, with responses ranging from 2,900 to 3,300 nonprofit organizations, educational institutions, and government entities. Based on these response rates (and as always, a heartfelt thank-you to the participants) I have confidence that the data is a fair reflection of trends at the grassroots level.


Nonprofits I Love: GuideStar

Editor's note: We were humbled yesterday to read a message from Dan Pallotta identifying GuideStar as a nonprofit he loves. We're excited that he's excited about our mission and thank him for allowing us to share his kind words here.

Hi Everyone,

I have seen the future of philanthropy and it is GuideStar. They have the potential to transform the world’s relationship to giving.


How to Deal with Uninformed Nonprofit-Watchdogs Around the Holidays

Around this time of the year, we nonprofits work to bring in year-end donations, incurring paper cuts and envelope-tongues in the process (seriously, the glue stick is your friend). Around this time also is when people start pushing “guides” about which nonprofits to give to, warning of shady nonprofits that spend too much on “overhead” and leave nothing for the people they are supposed to be serving.


How Funders Reduce “Nonprofit Starvation” with Tech Funding & Data Best Practices

Between the oft-cited “nonprofit starvation cycle” and a movement to debunk the “Overhead Myth” that holds many in philanthropy back from supporting nonprofit operational expenses, it can feel like the state of nonprofit funding today is grim.

We think that powerful examples of best practices can help turn the tide. So let’s talk about what’s going right. Some leading funders are increasing nonprofit capacity and supporting critical operations in key ways. 


GuideStar's 6 Tips for Busting the Overhead Myth


More than ever before,
the people on the front lines of
social change are in agreement: we need to evolve the conversation about nonprofit overhead. It's time to reduce the Overhead Myth's stranglehold on donors, the media, and the general public.


Donors Don’t Want Their Gifts Spent on Overhead … Or Do They?

 

“Overhead” can be a dirty word in nonprofit circles. It’s typically referred to as the costs associated with actually running a nonprofit – administrative costs, fundraising costs, staff costs, etc.


Dude, what’s with this notion that nonprofits don’t have clear outcomes?

 

The preceding is a cross-post of a March 7th article by Vu Le from his blog, Nonprofit with Balls. To read the original post, click here.

Hi everyone, this post will likely be my last coherent one for a while
, because my second baby is due to arrive next Tuesday, March 15
th (Eeeeeeek!) I plan to keep up with my weekly writing schedule, because I have my priorities. But that means the next 20 posts or so will reflect the hallucinogenic, meandering thoughts of a sleep-deprived father of a toddler and a newborn. Grammar and spelling may be questionable, and there will probably be a lot of baby-related analogies, such as “Restricting funding is like using duct tape as a diaper; sure, it makes you feel clever, but—OMG, please please just go to sleep, Daddy is so tired!”


The myth of double-dipping, and the destructiveness of restricted funding


I’ve written before about double-dipping being one of the worst accusations you can leverage against a nonprofit. It makes for an effective insult: “Your ED is so dumb, he went on eHarmony hoping to meet a logic model.” “Oh yeah? Well your org is so unethical, it reported that one funder paid for some food for a community gathering, but then also told another funder that they paid for the same food!” (#nonprofitinsults, in case you’re bored and want to start a new trend on Twitter)


Taking on the Ratios Myth Once Again